Expose the Left
July 14, 2006

If you haven’t seen today’s Vent with Michelle Malkin, do so now.




By: Ian at 12:50 am in General News | | Permalink


21 Responses to “Burka, Burka, Blue”
  1. 1
    Jaques Said:
    1:22 am  [ Quote ]

    You know the liberal mantra – diversity is good. This lady is nuts! Has she looked into the mirror lately? Message for Mrs. Malkin: You’re a filipino, you’re not white and never will be. If it wasn’t for the diversity of the US you wouldn’t be welcomed here either.

  2. 2
    Snake in the grass Said:
    1:33 am  [ Quote ]

    Wow. I can almost see the point sailing over your head.

  3. 3
    Rob Said:
    1:36 am  [ Quote ]

    I would recomend Psychiatric help for Michelle. She is such an attention whore. It’s sad that shes a coulter wannabe. Afterall Coulter is a man!

    HOw about a post about 33 republicans voting against renewing the voting rights act? I bet you wouldn’t touch that one with a 10 foot pole.

  4. 4
    The Machine Said:
    2:01 am  [ Quote ]

    Hey, looks like Jaques and Rob are jealous.

    They wannna wear a burka too.

    Of course they would call entire nations of evil men forcing all women to wear the same outfit “diversity”.

    The voting rights act does not need to be renewed. The civil rights act takes care of it. duh.

    whatta couple of dumbshits.

    Probably angry because they aren’t allowed to marry each other—except in massa-chusets.

    .

  5. 5
    MirCat Said:
    2:34 am  [ Quote ]

    Rob on July 14, 2006 at 1:36 am said:

    I would recomend Psychiatric help for Michelle. She is such an attention whore. It’s sad that shes a coulter wannabe. Afterall Coulter is a man!

    HOw about a post about 33 republicans voting against renewing the voting rights act? I bet you wouldn’t touch that one with a 10 foot pole.

    They voted against it because current violators are excluded from the act. FYI the act does not cover the entire country and it was the republicans that passed it in the first place and Johnson was forced to sign it.

  6. 6
    MirCat Said:
    2:36 am  [ Quote ]

    P.S. Those that voted against it were trying to force an amendment to it; expanding it’s range of influence.

  7. 7
    Bill McGubbin Said:
    3:07 am  [ Quote ]

    Burqa really suits Malkin.

  8. 8
    Jacques Said:
    3:22 am  [ Quote ]

    Of course they would call entire nations of evil men forcing all women to wear the same outfit “diversity”.

    I remember thinking the samething before I visited the UAE. Not all women in Arab countries are forced to wear burkas.

    Is that all you can bring to anything, The Machine. All you do is insult those who disagree with your appointed spokespeople.

    I guess you don’t see the hypocrisy in someone of filipino descent, and the child of immigrant parents, criticizing liberals who don’t have a problem with diversity.

    Now proceed with you childish insults and gay jokes. It sure makes you look like the winner you are. Maybe when you graduate from high school you’ll realize you don’t win arguments by insults and fag jokes.

  9. 9
    Snake in the grass Said:
    3:57 am  [ Quote ]

    So what is it about a burka that embraces diversity, exactly?

  10. 10
    Legal Taco Said:
    6:47 am  [ Quote ]

    Jaques Jaques Jaques Jaques

    Jaques on July 14, 2006 at 1:22 am said:

    You know the liberal mantra – diversity is good. This lady is nuts! Has she looked into the mirror lately? Message for Mrs. Malkin: You’re a filipino, you’re not white and never will be. If it wasn’t for the diversity of the US you wouldn’t be welcomed here either.

    ...Sounds to me, with that name, that you are some kind of French frog-eating surrender monkey…and “if it wasn’t for the diversity of the US you wouldn’t be welcomed here either.”

    Oh did I mention, you sound like a complete A-hole..

  11. 11
    Ray Charles Said:
    7:01 am  [ Quote ]

    Those really are beautiful fashions, though I must admit if I tried to get my woman to wear one, she would slit my throat.

    Of course libs believe in diversity, its why they go to such lengths to protect murderers and pedophiles…those animals provide diversity to our society.

  12. 12
    Ellsworth Said:
    8:13 am  [ Quote ]

    The lovely Michelle sticks it to the libs again!

  13. 13
    Harmonica Said:
    9:42 am  [ Quote ]

    Her point is that some liberals accept anything in the name of diversity. You are idiot if you leave with the impression she wants an arian nation. She is not against asians, blacks, whites, or whatever she against a facist cultures that abuse their women and treats them like an animal. She is pointing out you can’t sell out your principles for warm and fuzzy things like diveristy. How can a progessive person condone the pratice of forcing women to wear burkas?

  14. 14
    Galaga Said:
    10:33 am  [ Quote ]

    Because their multicultural bullshit trumps anything else, libs are so worried about offending anyone that they condone the worst of human behavior.

  15. 15
    Icerigger Said:
    1:57 pm  [ Quote ]

    Rob on July 14, 2006 at 1:36 am said:

    I would recomend Psychiatric help for Michelle. She is such an attention whore. It’s sad that shes a coulter wannabe. Afterall Coulter is a man!

    HOw about a post about 33 republicans voting against renewing the voting rights act? I bet you wouldn’t touch that one with a 10 foot pole.

    Rob you worthless fool. Why don’t you just come right out and say you approve of the Relgion of Puss’s oppression of women. While you’re at it let us know what you think about pIslam’s Hadiths instructing husbands to kill their wife if she doesn’t want to be a muslim anymore.

    You may now feel free to change the subject. Moron.

  16. 16
    Noodlehead Said:
    2:03 pm  [ Quote ]

    I was thinking…Do they have size 30 for men?

  17. 17
    Tim Said:
    2:08 pm  [ Quote ]

    Malkin is such a self hater. She thinks that she became white by marrying a white man and writing books that appeal to racist people. It is amazing what self hate forces people into advocating.

  18. 18
    Rose Said:
    2:11 pm  [ Quote ]

    There is a difference between someone born here of legal immigrants who has adopted the American language and culture and someone who comes here illigally and refuses to embrace this country and instead vows to take it over with their culture.

  19. 19
    Tim Said:
    2:17 pm  [ Quote ]

    Malkin was not born here of legal immigrants. Her parents were still on a work visa to United States when she was born. And according to Malkin’s own definition, she qualifies as an anchor baby.

  20. 20
    chitown Said:
    3:47 pm  [ Quote ]

    Is there a plastic big head dress that goes with it?

  21. 21
    Brian Said:
    7:26 pm  [ Quote ]

    Tim on July 14, 2006 at 2:08 pm said:

    Malkin is such a self hater. She thinks that she became white by marrying a white man and writing books that appeal to racist people. It is amazing what self hate forces people into advocating.

    Liberal Tolerance. Hey, last I checked the lefty definition of racist is when any advantaged person (white or male, usually both) dares to have any impact on the culture, values, or standards of society.

    Michelle is not an advantaged person, therefore she cannot be a racist, even by the lefty definition.

    By my definition of racism, that is, “injecting race into places where it does not belong”, YOU are a racist for suggesting that to be a successful online personality you are “acting white”, or “self-hating”.

    Why is it LIBERALS who always bring up the concept of self-hate? Guilty conscience?

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Register to comment here.