Expose the Left
July 6, 2006

Norah O’Donnell grilled Cindy Sheehan like a well-done burger on last night’s Hardball. Here’s some of the transcript (via The Media Blog):

NORAH O’DONNELL: Cindy Sheehan is America’s most outspoken anti-war activist. But does she speak for America or just the fringes? She’s called President Bush the biggest terrorist in the world and she stood side by side with socialist dictator Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. Now she begins a two-month hunger strike to get the American people to join her mission to end the war. Welcome to Hardball, Cindy. Let me begin by asking you, you know, Americans may hate the war, but they don’t necessarily hate the president. How do you expect to get change by going around the world and trashing the president of the United States?

CINDY SHEEHAN: Actually, I don’t hate the president either. I don’t trash the president, I trash the president’s foreign policy, which is fundamentally and inherently wrong and immoral. And I don’t tell people around the world anything that they don’t know.

O’DONNELL: But you called him the biggest terrorist in the world. So you are trashing the president.

SHEEHAN: Well you know he says a terrorist is somebody who kills innocent men, women and children, and there has been [sic] over 100,000 innocent men, women and children killed in Iraq on his orders.

VIDEO – .WMV



Blue Star Chronicles linked with Cindy Rolling Fast Past Fame...
Conservative Blog Therapy linked with Cindy Sheehan is so far gone it's almost hard to believe... ...
The Texas Songbird linked with Queen Moonbat Shrieks Again...
Cigar Intelligence Agency linked with Thursday links


106 Responses to “Sheehan Defends Chavez, Denounces Bush (VIDEO)”
  1. 1
    Rascal Said:
    1:05 pm  [ Quote ]

    Slam Dunk goes Cindy, way to do it Norah. Norah Scores 3 pointer swish. Cindy dunked from half court.

  2. 2
    Ray Charles Said:
    1:08 pm  [ Quote ]

    “Killed on his orders”.....whoooooooooo boy, this woman is crazier than a shit-house loon.

    You hang out with psychos like Code Pink and pretty soon everyone is buying into one anothers bullshiite.

    One fine day, all that hatred and psychosis is going to come full circle, her mind will snap and Ms. Sheehe is going to fall like a load of bricks. It wont be pretty.

  3. 3
    Rascal Said:
    1:11 pm  [ Quote ]

    Ray Charles on July 6, 2006 at 1:08 pm said:

    “Killed on his orders”.....whoooooooooo boy, this woman is crazier than a shit-house loon.

    You hang out with psychos like Code Pink and pretty soon everyone is buying into one anothers bullshiite.

    One fine day, all that hatred and psychosis is going to come full circle, her mind will snap and Ms. Sheehe is going to fall like a load of bricks. It wont be pretty.

    Ray! Jack Murtha is also affiliated with Code Pink, did you know that one?

  4. 4
    Bob Said:
    1:15 pm  [ Quote ]

    Ya, i remember Bush giving that press conference to tell those “insurgents” (not terrorists) to keep planting car boms in crowded markets to kill innocent men women and children. Thank you for clearing that up for us Cindy!! (you look like the crypt keeper with a bad hair do)

  5. 5
    Rob Said:
    1:31 pm  [ Quote ]

    I can only look at that face and listen to that voice for so long before my stomach turns.

  6. 6
    Josef Said:
    1:34 pm  [ Quote ]

    I presume the attacks on MSNBC will stop sometime soon.

    Norah O’Donnell is one hottie on our side!!

  7. 7
    JWL Said:
    1:39 pm  [ Quote ]

    Cindy says: “Actually, I don’t hate the president either. I don’t trash the president, I trash the president’s foreign policy

    Reeeeeally?

    So anyway that filth-spewer and warmonger, George Bush was speaking...”

    -Cindy

    That lying bastard, George Bush...”

    -Cindy

    These villains, and in particular the villain Bush… These cowards have no morals. They have no shame about lying.

    -Cindy

    Why is Cindy lying?

  8. 8
    Josef Said:
    1:41 pm  [ Quote ]

    Cindy Sheehan would like to live under Hugo Chavez…

    I recommend pointing your browser HERE first, Cindy.

  9. 9
    Josef Said:
    1:41 pm  [ Quote ]

    JWL on July 6, 2006 at 1:39 pm said:

    Cindy says: “Actually, I don’t hate the president either. I don’t trash the president, I trash the president’s foreign policy

    Reeeeeally?

    So anyway that filth-spewer and warmonger, George Bush was speaking...”

    -Cindy

    That lying bastard, George Bush...”

    -Cindy

    These villains, and in particular the villain Bush… These cowards have no morals. They have no shame about lying.

    -Cindy

    Why is Cindy lying?

    Because she’s a bad person.

  10. 10
    WMD Maker Said:
    1:43 pm  [ Quote ]

    Ray Charles said
    “You hang out with psychos like Code Pink and pretty soon everyone is buying into one anothers bullshiite.”

    Thats what happens when someone has their nose up someones but for so long, First they get s**t on the brain then it starts to displace the brain and they end up with S**T FOR BRAINS

  11. 11
    USN6872 Said:
    1:45 pm  [ Quote ]

    ignis fatuus = Cindy

  12. 12
    Cigar Intelligence Agency » Blog Archive » Thursday links Pinged With:
    1:49 pm  [ Quote ]

    [...] Perinneal moonbat Cindy Sheehan, fasting to protest the war, says she’d rather live in Venezuela under dictator Hugo Chavez than in the US under George Bush.  Expose the Left has video.  Our only question is: what’s keeping her from leaving? [...]

  13. 13
    Hello Said:
    2:00 pm  [ Quote ]

    I don’t know why she won’t move but I’m willing to donate money to move her and her merry band of peaceniks to Venezuela.

  14. 14
    Umnumzana Said:
    2:04 pm  [ Quote ]

    It is not very upsetting or even sad for Cindy Sheehan to spout her anti-war, sixties hippie, anti-American and Bush hating filth. I DON’T CARE! She is a sick old broad!

    What does concern me is that a lot of people listen to her and take her seriously. She has been standing on her dead, hero son’s body for too long now, she needs to quietly go away.

  15. 15
    Rascal Said:
    2:06 pm  [ Quote ]

    USN6872 on July 6, 2006 at 1:45 pm said:

    ignis fatuus = Cindy

    USN6872 Said ignis fatuus = Cindy

    LOL Oh my USN6872 I about busted a gut laughing over that one.

  16. 16
    Rascal Said:
    2:09 pm  [ Quote ]

    WMD Maker on July 6, 2006 at 1:43 pm said:

    Ray Charles said
    “You hang out with psychos like Code Pink and pretty soon everyone is buying into one anothers bullshiite.”

    Thats what happens when someone has their nose up someones but for so long, First they get s**t on the brain then it starts to displace the brain and they end up with S**T FOR BRAINS

    WMD Maker that is truly the very best quote of the day so far. LOL

  17. 17
    benrand Said:
    2:23 pm  [ Quote ]

    She looks like Lenny from laverne and SHirley.

    David St. Hubbins?

  18. 18
    Steph Said:
    2:36 pm  [ Quote ]

    Please do not insult Lenny like that.

    Casey Sheehan wanted nothing to do with his mother. He wanted to change the beneficiary of his benefits to his father but didn’t to it before he died.

  19. 19
    charles Said:
    2:41 pm  [ Quote ]

    Cindy Sheehan is so full of shit. She has no idea about what she speaks. But people on the left love her. It’s that easy to become a left-wing celebrity. Funny shirt of her at politees.net cindy sheehan as “american idiot” Anyway, it’s funny to think people look up to this bitch.

  20. 20
    The Boodge Said:
    2:44 pm  [ Quote ]

    AMERICAN IDIOT Someone needs to slap this bitch back into reality! http://www.politees.net

  21. 21
    righthanded Said:
    2:44 pm  [ Quote ]

    Dear Cindy,

    PLEASE LEAVE THE USA, AND MOVE TO VENEZEULA, AND NEVER COME BACK!

    WHAT THE FUCK IS STOPPING YOU???

  22. 22
    miken Said:
    2:49 pm  [ Quote ]

    Josef on July 6, 2006 at 1:34 pm said:

    I presume the attacks on MSNBC will stop sometime soon.

    Norah O’Donnell is one hottie on our side!!

    well josefHELL (haha another pun! teehee…) MSNBC is part of the terrorist networks and by even throwing any support their way you support communism, gay marriage, and abortion. why dont you go back to the taliban?

  23. 23
    Jackie Said:
    2:57 pm  [ Quote ]

    CODEPINK- “women for peace” How horrible! Oh, an organization that promotes peace! The horror! What is the world coming to?

  24. 24
    Tom Said:
    3:04 pm  [ Quote ]

    If you mean they “promote peace” by denigrating everything that is American, then I guess you’re right.

  25. 25
    Kid Fu Said:
    3:04 pm  [ Quote ]

    Um…I don’t know what you commenters listened to but Sheehan verbally whipped that moron O’Donnell. You are, individually and collectively, hateful idiots. Bush’s regime consists of a pack of lying, cowardly war mongers and you are all mindless foder for the machine. Go to your church and stay there geniuses!

  26. 26
    Brian Said:
    3:06 pm  [ Quote ]

    Josef on July 6, 2006 at 1:41 pm said:

    Cindy Sheehan would like to live under Hugo Chavez…

    I recommend pointing your browser HERE first, Cindy.

    I believe she meant “have sexs with” when she said “under”, because her husband has run FAR, FAR AWAY by now.

  27. 27
    Bob Said:
    3:07 pm  [ Quote ]

    Code pink actively also sends money to help the iraq insurgency, these people are aiding and abetting terrorists, and I don’t understand why they all havent been locked up already. Don’t forget these were the same people also protesting outside the walter reed memorial hospital.

  28. 28
    Brian Said:
    3:10 pm  [ Quote ]

    Kid Fu on July 6, 2006 at 3:04 pm said:

    Um…I don’t know what you commenters listened to but Sheehan verbally whipped that moron O’Donnell. You are, individually and collectively, hateful idiots. Bush’s regime consists of a pack of lying, cowardly war mongers and you are all mindless foder for the machine. Go to your church and stay there geniuses!

    LOL! Dude, you are GREAT at sarcasm. That was SO AWESOME.

    Next I’l sure you’ll generate those documents where Bush orders our troops to kill people.

  29. 29
    Kid Fu Said:
    3:12 pm  [ Quote ]

    Yeah…sarcasm.

  30. 30
    Bob Said:
    3:13 pm  [ Quote ]

    That was a clever retort Kid Fu. Nice of you to provide examples instead of name calling. This is why your side can’t win elections.

    You are, individually and collectively, hateful idiots. Bush’s regime consists of a pack of lying, cowardly war mongers and you are all mindless foder for the machine.

    Individually and collectively wow.

    Detail each lie, and show documented proof. Oh wait you have none so shut it.

    Cowardly war monger? I guess your referring to something like national guard isn’t real service or something. I think their is a couplle million national guard troops who would like to put a boot in your behind for that one.

    mindless foder for the machine?

    Seriously what is this machine? Is it the corporation machine, that you know does the corporations, and then the corporations act all corporationy? Explain? Or maybe the machine is a thigh master, who knows how to follow logic in liberal world.

    Your a d-bag Fu.

  31. 31
    Jackie Said:
    3:15 pm  [ Quote ]

    Bob on July 6, 2006 at 3:07 pm said:

    Code pink actively also sends money to help the iraq insurgency, these people are aiding and abetting terrorists, and I don’t understand why they all havent been locked up already. Don’t forget these were the same people also protesting outside the walter reed memorial hospital.

    They support the women of Iraq- as the violence has made them more apt to be brutalized and the present government has curtailed their rights.

    As far as aiding and abetting terrorists, just typical Republican propaganda.

    BTW- Kid Fu- I completely agree. I though Cindy held up great in the face of Nora’s attacks. As always, if Nora supports this war, how come she doesn’t join?

  32. 32
    Ray Charles Said:
    3:19 pm  [ Quote ]

    Bush’s regime consists of a pack of lying, cowardly war mongers and you are all mindless foder for the machine. Go to your church and stay there geniuses!

    Are you saying all conservatives are Christian or that no liberals are?

    BTW, before you make satirical attacks on someone’s intelligence, you might want to learn how to spell. “Foder” is correctly spelled as “fodder”. Way to go, genius.

  33. 33
    Tom Said:
    3:21 pm  [ Quote ]

    “They support the women of Iraq- as the violence has made them more apt to be brutalized and the present government has curtailed their rights.”

    and under Saddam, poetry circles and Lillith Fairs were the order of the day (that is unless it was your turn to have your clitoris snipped off or served up to Uday in one of his rape rooms)

  34. 34
    Bob Said:
    3:22 pm  [ Quote ]

    Oh silly me, i thought the old ways of not being allowing to be served in government and sitting in the rape rooms of saddam’s sons were not a violation of rights. I see now that those things have changed their rights have been curtailled.

    Also do you have any idea who Nora is? Nora O’dennell is a huge liberal and critic of the war. We are just happy that someone finally called Sheehan out on her complete hypocrisy. If you can’t see that maybe you should wear moose antlers on your head so we can all know who you are.

  35. 35
    A-Pimp-Called-Daddy-Welfare Said:
    3:23 pm  [ Quote ]

    don’t they burn the clitoris off?

    snipped, burned whatever… let’s do this to Cindindy :)

  36. 36
    Ray Charles Said:
    3:23 pm  [ Quote ]

    Code Pink is also speaking out against nuclear war with Iran….uh….what war?

    Maybe these brave souls should travel to Darfur where muslim black women are routinely raped and/or killed by muslim arab men. Of course, the Coders may be raped and killed themselves…must be why their courage has failed. Brave, brave souls.

  37. 37
    EEprom Said:
    3:27 pm  [ Quote ]

    Kid Fu on July 6, 2006 at 3:12 pm said:

    Yeah…sarcasm.

    No….stupidity.

  38. 38
    anaconda Said:
    3:27 pm  [ Quote ]

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 2:57 pm said:

    CODEPINK- “women for peace” How horrible! Oh, an organization that promotes peace! The horror! What is the world coming to?

    These are not exactly mainstream Americans.

    Code Pink is opposed to:

    Iraq War
    War on Terrorism
    Afghanistan War
    Vietnam War
    War of 1812
    American Civil War
    Second Boer War

    This is an organization that is opposed to the AFGHAN WAR and removing the Taliban and they fully admit they are pacifists and appeasers.

    They don’t even support or acknowledge the “War on Terror” or that we have a right to fight it.

    They are free to believe whatever they want. I just don’t want any of them in our government.

    In a perfect world, there would be no violence and no insane dictator would ever launch missiles because he wasn’t getting enough attention with everything else going on in the world.

    In addition to that, in a perfect world, Jessica Simpson would ask me to marry her tomorrow and we’d live happily ever after.

    Too bad none of that is ever going to happen because it’s completely unrealistic.

    FREEDOM ISN’T FREE.

    If we had appeased every dictator that wanted to do us harm, we wouldn’t be speaking English in the United States today.

  39. 39
    A-Pimp-Called-Daddy-Welfare Said:
    3:31 pm  [ Quote ]

    and like I said in another thead… if she hates living here, under Bush so bad, and would rather live in Venezuela under Hugo Chavez, what the hell is stopping her?

    I am willing to pay her one-way fare…

    I’ll even spring for first-class seats!

  40. 40
    conor Said:
    3:31 pm  [ Quote ]

    jackie, your question is typical liberal propaganda

    “oh why dont you join”

    are you for intervention in darfur, jackie?
    say no and youll dodge the follow up.

    plenty of people on the far left, which includes people in code pink support this “iraqi resistance.”

    i also liked when code pink took a photo of arab women protesting iranian islamic leadership and turning it into a photo for recruitment

    i guess thats how they support women abroad..

  41. 41
    Jackie Said:
    3:33 pm  [ Quote ]

    Tom on July 6, 2006 at 3:21 pm said:

    “They support the women of Iraq- as the violence has made them more apt to be brutalized and the present government has curtailed their rights.”

    and under Saddam, poetry circles and Lillith Fairs were the order of the day (that is unless it was your turn to have your clitoris snipped off or served up to Uday in one of his rape rooms)

    Thats right. Typical Republican response of “so it was better when Saddam was in power” crap. Ask that question to the mother of a soldier who just died and see what answer you get.

    Just face it- while we invaded a country that had “WMD” that have never been found:
    -Afganistan has fallen apart – Iran and North Korea are going nuclear
    -the Bush Administration has borrowed more money from foreign governments and banks than all other American administrations put together from 1776 to 2000 – anti-American sentiment is at an all time high
    etc, etc. But on a positive note- at least he hasn’t gotten a blow job from an intern. Then we would be in big trouble- right?

  42. 42
    Jackie Said:
    3:39 pm  [ Quote ]

    conor on July 6, 2006 at 3:31 pm said:

    jackie, your question is typical liberal propaganda

    “oh why dont you join”

    are you for intervention in darfur, jackie?
    say no and youll dodge the follow up.

    plenty of people on the far left, which includes people in code pink support this “iraqi resistance.”

    i also liked when code pink took a photo of arab women protesting iranian islamic leadership and turning it into a photo for recruitment

    i guess thats how they support women abroad..

    Darfur? Why would we invade Darfur? There is no oil there!

    Just because you oppose the war does not mean you support the insurgency. That is just spin to discredit people who support peace.

  43. 43
    frogcatcher Said:
    3:40 pm  [ Quote ]

    LIke her former husbands. The left needs to divorce her. She is as looney as they get. I know, have her parachute into Sader City, IRAQ and perhaps her persuasive influence can get the terrorist to lay down their arms.

  44. 44
    Hello Said:
    3:42 pm  [ Quote ]

    Well Jackie why don’t you ask the parents of a Marine Officer who died who support what the military is doing. My husband has told me again and again that if he dies while over there to make sure his message of what he believes in gets out. However, only blind fools like youself see the that there are only a few who speak out against the war after their children, spouses, parents were killed in the war. However, those are the only ones you want to listen to the rest you and the MSM ignores.
    I think the only reason O’Donnell went after icky Cindy is that she wants to show to all the world that she can question Sheehag to show the left isn’t using her as a human shield. When the diatribe you all have about Coulter’s book dies down it will be fawning over icky again.

  45. 45
    conor Said:
    3:46 pm  [ Quote ]

    “Just face it- while we invaded a country that had “WMD” that have never been found:
    -Afganistan has fallen apart – Iran and North Korea are going nuclear”

    1) WMD - Dave Gaubatz ever ring a bell? Uninspected sites in Iraq ring a bell? David Kay talking about transports out of iraq prior to the war ring a bell? Georges Sada ring a bell?
    2) Korea cant get a missile up their own ass and you liberals are trying to scare people about their “threat.” And what makes you think we DON’T have people in Iran, trying to undermine their nuclear capabilities. Idk, if we go it alone we’re unilateral and pigheaded. If we rely on european countries to take a large role in talks and negotiations, we’re not doing enough. People like you jackie will never be satisfied.

    idk, people like you will keep going on about civil wars in iraq, but we dont see it

  46. 46
    anaconda Said:
    3:46 pm  [ Quote ]

    “Thats right. Typical Republican response of “so it was better when Saddam was in power” crap. Ask that question to the mother of a soldier who just died and see what answer you get.”

    There are a few people who frequently comment on this website who have lost family members in Iraq.

    I know for certain that at least one of them lost a son and another lost a brother. They STRONGLY support the effort in Iraq and they STRONGLY support President Bush.

    Cindy Sheehan is NOT the only mother who lost a family member in Iraq and I would bet the ranch that most of the family members of those fallen heroes want the United States to finish the job.

    A very strong majority of the soldiers in Iraq voted for President Bush over John Kerry. The numbers aren’t even close.

    Why do you think these soldiers and families STRONGLY supported President Bush and not John Kerry? Are they stupid?

  47. 47
    conor Said:
    3:47 pm  [ Quote ]

    ugh, im not even a huge conservative

    but you liberals pull the hate right out of me

  48. 48
    A-Pimp-Called-Daddy-Welfare Said:
    3:47 pm  [ Quote ]

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 3:39 pm said:

    conor on July 6, 2006 at 3:31 pm said:

    jackie, your question is typical liberal propaganda

    “oh why dont you join”

    are you for intervention in darfur, jackie?
    say no and youll dodge the follow up.

    plenty of people on the far left, which includes people in code pink support this “iraqi resistance.”

    i also liked when code pink took a photo of arab women protesting iranian islamic leadership and turning it into a photo for recruitment

    i guess thats how they support women abroad..

    Darfur? Why would we invade Darfur? There is no oil there!

    Just because you oppose the war does not mean you support the insurgency. That is just spin to discredit people who support peace.

    Okay Jackie, given a choice of one or the other, who do you support?

    The USA? or the insurgents?
    and explain why you made the choice you did.

  49. 49
    Jackie Said:
    3:49 pm  [ Quote ]

    My family member who just had he legs blown off by a road side bomb and wonders why—I guess he is “only a few”. Or my uncle who suffered from PTSD and substance abuse for ten years after the horrors he saw during his ten month service in VietNam—that was worth it too. We can agree to disagree-

  50. 50
    miken Said:
    3:55 pm  [ Quote ]

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 3:49 pm said:

    My family member who just had he legs blown off by a road side bomb and wonders why—I guess he is “only a few”. Or my uncle who suffered from PTSD and substance abuse for ten years after the horrors he saw during his ten month service in VietNam—that was worth it too. We can agree to disagree-

    According to Rummy, they’re just “battle-hardened”

  51. 51
    conor Said:
    3:55 pm  [ Quote ]

    jackie i like the little oil bit you threw in there to offset my question

    if you support intervention in darfur, in any way, shape or form, why dont you go try to see if you can go over there and help

  52. 52
    conor Said:
    3:57 pm  [ Quote ]

    hopefully now you get the point that your little tactic of asking people why they havent joined isnt right.

  53. 53
    Jackie Said:
    3:58 pm  [ Quote ]

    The USA! and I am offended that you would ask a question like that. I love this country- that is why I am so critical of it. I am against the war but I support the troups. They are following orders because that is there job- I am against the Bush Administration and their foreign policy. They are the ones that put them their and they shouldn’t have.

    Darfur is a crime against humanity and there should be strong multi-national pressure placed on the government to protect the civilians- but we don’t because there is no money in it. No natural resources to exploit, no usefullness to establish a military base, etc.

  54. 54
    A-Pimp-Called-Daddy-Welfare Said:
    3:59 pm  [ Quote ]

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 3:49 pm said:

    My family member who just had he legs blown off by a road side bomb and wonders why—I guess he is “only a few”. Or my uncle who suffered from PTSD and substance abuse for ten years after the horrors he saw during his ten month service in VietNam—that was worth it too. We can agree to disagree-

    JFK sent your uncle to Nam.

    and when are you going to answer my question?

  55. 55
    A-Pimp-Called-Daddy-Welfare Said:
    4:03 pm  [ Quote ]

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 3:58 pm said:

    The USA! and I am offended that you would ask a question like that. I love this country- that is why I am so critical of it. I am against the war but I support the troups. They are following orders because that is there job- I am against the Bush Administration and their foreign policy. They are the ones that put them their and they shouldn’t have.

    Darfur is a crime against humanity and there should be strong multi-national pressure placed on the government to protect the civilians- but we don’t because there is no money in it. No natural resources to exploit, no usefullness to establish a military base, etc.

    So, explain why we should go fight a war for “nothing”.

    As far as I’m concerned (and many here share my view) I’d rather be fighting the terrorists in Iraq than in Indiana.

  56. 56
    conor Said:
    4:04 pm  [ Quote ]

    still playin the game of dodgeball jax.

    i guess saddams rape rooms and the mass graves werent C.A.H? or those childrens torture chambers our soldiers found on the outskirts of iraq?

  57. 57
    conor Said:
    4:06 pm  [ Quote ]

    im done throwin balls to be dodged, later

  58. 58
    Jackie Said:
    4:06 pm  [ Quote ]

    A-Pimp-Called-Daddy-Welfare on July 6, 2006 at 3:59 pm said:

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 3:49 pm said:

    My family member who just had he legs blown off by a road side bomb and wonders why—I guess he is “only a few”. Or my uncle who suffered from PTSD and substance abuse for ten years after the horrors he saw during his ten month service in VietNam—that was worth it too. We can agree to disagree-

    JFK sent your uncle to Nam.

    and when are you going to answer my question?

    Actually if you want to get picky- it was Eisenhower who first sent troups in to help the French. I answered your question.

  59. 59
    Harmonica Said:
    4:13 pm  [ Quote ]

    BTW- Kid Fu- I completely agree. I though Cindy held up great in the face of Nora’s attacks. As always, if Nora supports this war, how come she doesn’t join?WTF is the US Army going to do with 40+ year old women?

  60. 60
    anaconda Said:
    4:14 pm  [ Quote ]

    A-Pimp-Called-Daddy-Welfare on July 6, 2006 at 4:03 pm said:

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 3:58 pm said:

    The USA! and I am offended that you would ask a question like that. I love this country- that is why I am so critical of it. I am against the war but I support the troups. They are following orders because that is there job- I am against the Bush Administration and their foreign policy. They are the ones that put them their and they shouldn’t have.

    Darfur is a crime against humanity and there should be strong multi-national pressure placed on the government to protect the civilians- but we don’t because there is no money in it. No natural resources to exploit, no usefullness to establish a military base, etc.

    So, explain why we should go fight a war for “nothing”.

    As far as I’m concerned (and many here share my view) I’d rather be fighting the terrorists in Iraq than in Indiana.

    Well, if they DO come to Indiana to fight us on American streets, I’ll do my best to fend them off with my small arsenal.

    Where do you live in Indiana?

  61. 61
    Josef Said:
    4:19 pm  [ Quote ]

    miken on July 6, 2006 at 2:49 pm said:

    Josef on July 6, 2006 at 1:34 pm said:

    I presume the attacks on MSNBC will stop sometime soon.

    Norah O’Donnell is one hottie on our side!!

    well josefHELL (haha another pun! teehee…) MSNBC is part of the terrorist networks and by even throwing any support their way you support communism, gay marriage, and abortion. why dont you go back to the taliban?

    You made absolutely no sense.

    The Taliban kills gays.

  62. 62
    A-Pimp-Called-Daddy-Welfare Said:
    4:19 pm  [ Quote ]

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 3:33 pm said:

    Tom on July 6, 2006 at 3:21 pm said:

    “They support the women of Iraq- as the violence has made them more apt to be brutalized and the present government has curtailed their rights.”

    and under Saddam, poetry circles and Lillith Fairs were the order of the day (that is unless it was your turn to have your clitoris snipped off or served up to Uday in one of his rape rooms)

    Thats right. Typical Republican response of “so it was better when Saddam was in power” crap. Ask that question to the mother of a soldier who just died and see what answer you get.

    Just face it- while we invaded a country that had “WMD” that have never been found:
    -Afganistan has fallen apart – Iran and North Korea are going nuclear
    -the Bush Administration has borrowed more money from foreign governments and banks than all other American administrations put together from 1776 to 2000 – anti-American sentiment is at an all time high
    etc, etc. But on a positive note- at least he hasn’t gotten a blow job from an intern. Then we would be in big trouble- right?

    ok… I dinna see this before (I’m at work and can just glaze over stuff most of the time)

    I’ve been to 7 funerals for soldiers. None of the mothers I know agree with you. (3 are family, 4 are friends I’ve known for most of the 34 years I been around)

    OH… Eisenhower sent a few troops to Nam in the 50’s… JFK & Johnson stepped that up quite a bit… Johnson was known to refer to nam as “My War”

  63. 63
    Mallard T. Drake Said:
    4:31 pm  [ Quote ]

    We are seeing the “Coulter effect” with the Hardball interview. The media may start getting in the face of these lib “human shields” and grill them on their wacko stances. Then the country and world will see these nuts for who they are and not fall back to “oh, she lost a son, so you can’t question her views.”

    Let’s see President Bush freed 80 million-plus Iraqis from tyranny and oppression. Hugo Chavez sold heating oil to poor Americans at low cost. LONG LIVE HUGO! Whatta guy. Let’s all move to Venezuela!

    What a maroon! Instead of sending her to Venezuela, let’s send her to Iraq and have her talk face-to-face with Iraqi citizens. Let’s see her try and spin her ‘George Bush is a terrorist’ vitrol to them and see their reaction.

  64. 64
    A-Pimp-Called-Daddy-Welfare Said:
    4:32 pm  [ Quote ]

    anaconda on July 6, 2006 at 4:14 pm said:

    A-Pimp-Called-Daddy-Welfare on July 6, 2006 at 4:03 pm said:

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 3:58 pm said:

    The USA! and I am offended that you would ask a question like that. I love this country- that is why I am so critical of it. I am against the war but I support the troups. They are following orders because that is there job- I am against the Bush Administration and their foreign policy. They are the ones that put them their and they shouldn’t have.

    Darfur is a crime against humanity and there should be strong multi-national pressure placed on the government to protect the civilians- but we don’t because there is no money in it. No natural resources to exploit, no usefullness to establish a military base, etc.

    So, explain why we should go fight a war for “nothing”.

    As far as I’m concerned (and many here share my view) I’d rather be fighting the terrorists in Iraq than in Indiana.

    Well, if they DO come to Indiana to fight us on American streets, I’ll do my best to fend them off with my small arsenal.

    Where do you live in Indiana?

    I don’t live in Indiana.. I live in Pennsylvania…

    I guess I typed “Indiana” cause it starts with an “I” like Iraq.

    I work in New York City… lived downtown on 9/11… unlike many people here I didn’t get to watch that on TV… I will always be 100% for fighting our enemies on their land.

  65. 65
    Umnumzana Said:
    4:41 pm  [ Quote ]

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 2:57 pm said:

    CODEPINK- “women for peace” How horrible! Oh, an organization that promotes peace! The horror! What is the world coming to?

    Code Pink promotes peace at any price! Peace without safety; peace which causes us to surrender our liberty; peace which causes us to surrender our moral/spiritual values; peace which requires us to fund our enemies; peace which causes us to sell out our ally Israel; peace which causes us to surrender all that our Founding Father’s and our many brave soldiers gave us at a very high price to their lives, fortunes and honor, and that peace is too high a price to pay!

    Holy Scripture tells us blessed are the peacemakers; but considering Islam is our enemy, would the Lord have us Christians turn from Him and serve Allah so we can live in peace? No! Because we cannot exchange our physical lives and surrender our eternal souls, for the sake of peace. The same thing applies to the Code Pink, Jimmy Carter type appeasement peacemakers; when they ask us in the interest of peace to unilaterally surrender those things we hold more dearly than our lives, like family, country, honor; we have to decide if her peace is worth it!

    I remember the soldier who wrote home from Iraq just before his death, and told his parents that he believed in our mission in Iraq and of the pleasure it gave him to help free innocent Iraqi citizens; and he told his family if he died it was a price he was willing to pay. Or, the mother of a Marine who painted her SUV and went around the country showing pictures of her dead son and his comrades in his platoon who also died, so she could tell everyone how proud she was of all of them and America.

    Cindy’s voice is a bitter, shrill cry from a woman who had selfishly divorced her husband and left her hero son with his father; because her own egocentric needs were more important to her than the people who loved her. Despite her son volunteering for Iraq and dying a hero’s death because of his belief in our mission there, she used his grave; standing on his dead body to at last get the attention she craved all her life and loves more than her son.

    Cindy is an example of sick narcissism, which has made it clear to everyone that she was and is a socialist. She has embraced Chavez and left this country’s shores to spread her treason to ever willing ear, because she hates herself and hate America.

    It is not peace Cindy seeks, in her inflated idea of her own self importance, she just wants attention and she will do anything, no matter how low to that attention.

  66. 66
    Asmodeus Said:
    4:42 pm  [ Quote ]

    How classic of a leftist tool can Cindy Sheehan be. This front-line warrior of left is why liberalism/leftism needs to be eradicated from the face of the earth. It’s her very mentality, philosophy, and ideology that is getting people killed and is in direct support of the nature of evil and those that carry out that evil in the name of the leftist ideology.

    Cindy Sheehan is a liar without compare. Her Code Pink comrades are as culpable in their lies as well. She sprays around the 100,000 Iraqi dead statistic like she was lifting her leg to mark her territory, even though this statistic has been debunked ad nausem. Not to mention that she neglects to mention that the insurgency that is being funded and fueled by Iran, Syria, Saddams remaining cohorts, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and the UAE is responsible for more civilian targetting and deaths than anyone else. This is a fact. The US doesn’t target civilians. This is a fact. Civilian casualties occur due to the theatre of operations we are in. This is a fact. The insurgency uses civilian targetting as a political tool. This is a fact. Cindy Sheehan conveniently ignores this fact even though she knows this occurs. This makes her willfully ignorant, which in turn makes her a double liar.

    The woman is a seditionist 5th columnist of the worst kind, her compatriots are also in line with her. The fact that she is even given air time with these positions that she holds is more telling of how the MSM views her even in the face of Norah O’Donell’s grilling of this leftist tool. Whatever cache this woman had in the form of sympathy due to her son giving the ultimate sacrifice for her to spout off this way and for her country has been totally and completely spent and dissolved because of her actions, deeds, and words. She is reviled amongst the larger populace not uplifted and she should be castigated at every opportunity and debunked as a charlatan.

  67. 67
    miken Said:
    4:46 pm  [ Quote ]

    Josef on July 6, 2006 at 4:19 pm said:

    miken on July 6, 2006 at 2:49 pm said:

    Josef on July 6, 2006 at 1:34 pm said:

    I presume the attacks on MSNBC will stop sometime soon.

    Norah O’Donnell is one hottie on our side!!

    well josefHELL (haha another pun! teehee…) MSNBC is part of the terrorist networks and by even throwing any support their way you support communism, gay marriage, and abortion. why dont you go back to the taliban?

    You made absolutely no sense.

    The Taliban kills gays.

    why do you hate america?

  68. 68
    Asmodeus Said:
    4:47 pm  [ Quote ]

    Mallard T. Drake on July 6, 2006 at 4:31 pm said:

    We are seeing the “Coulter effect” with the Hardball interview. The media may start getting in the face of these lib “human shields” and grill them on their wacko stances. Then the country and world will see these nuts for who they are and not fall back to “oh, she lost a son, so you can’t question her views.”

    Let’s see President Bush freed 80 million-plus Iraqis from tyranny and oppression. Hugo Chavez sold heating oil to poor Americans at low cost. LONG LIVE HUGO! Whatta guy. Let’s all move to Venezuela!

    What a maroon! Instead of sending her to Venezuela, let’s send her to Iraq and have her talk face-to-face with Iraqi citizens. Let’s see her try and spin her ‘George Bush is a terrorist’ vitrol to them and see their reaction.

    Hugo Chavez gave lip service to selling low heating oil to those that are down-trodden in our country. Where is the proof of the actual sales themselves? I haven’t seen them have you? I haven’t seen the price of heating oil go down, have you? I haven’t seen the flooding of venuezalan oil in this country due to Hugo Chavez’ egomaniacal castro-like hogwashing, have you?

    Cindy wants to be with Hugo, then let her stay there and further disprove that socialism and leftism is a farce on it’s own merits.

  69. 69
    Rascal Said:
    4:52 pm  [ Quote ]

    Geez I step out to do some chores and come back and noticed that HappyHookerUK sends in his two commie cousin friends, Jackie & Kid Fu

  70. 70
    WMD Maker Said:
    4:55 pm  [ Quote ]

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 4:06 pm said:

    A-Pimp-Called-Daddy-Welfare on July 6, 2006 at 3:59 pm said:

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 3:49 pm said:

    My family member who just had he legs blown off by a road side bomb and wonders why—I guess he is “only a few”. Or my uncle who suffered from PTSD and substance abuse for ten years after the horrors he saw during his ten month service in VietNam—that was worth it too. We can agree to disagree-

    JFK sent your uncle to Nam.

    and when are you going to answer my question?

    Actually if you want to get picky- it was Eisenhower who first sent troups in to help the French. I answered your question.

    They were sent to “train” the Vietnamese army. In this role they were not supposed to be in the field. They had little if anything to do with the French. Kennedy made them advisors which changed it to a field role, supposedly non-combat. Get shot at but cant shoot back, ya, right, sure thing kemosabby.

  71. 71
    Asmodeus Said:
    4:58 pm  [ Quote ]

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 3:49 pm said:

    My family member who just had he legs blown off by a road side bomb and wonders why—I guess he is “only a few”. Or my uncle who suffered from PTSD and substance abuse for ten years after the horrors he saw during his ten month service in VietNam—that was worth it too. We can agree to disagree-

    There is no more agreement to disagree in this conflict. You want to be pacified by islamofascists because you want to cry like a spoiled child about your opinion on what bad foreign policy is when you’ve never read a single tract of anything remotely resembling a foreign policy? You want to hold up your wounded family members to the rest of us to make your argument that you don’t like this war, but support our troops because they are ordered to go fight a war against an enemy that collaborates and collaborated with those that attacked us? You want to use them to make your argument matter? You want to use them to justify your selfish preening position that no war is justifiable? If that’s the case, then which war is and why? It’s unfortunate that our soldiers are being maimed and over 2500 have given their lives for you to cry on a blog about it. It’s unfortunate that you seem to be on the cusp of being incapable of truly understanding the evil nature of the enemy we are fighting. If we lose this conflict because of people like you, you won’t get a choice about which foreign policy or which administration you don’t like because of it.

    You will be given the choice of convert or die. Sharia or oblivion. Is that what you want, because that is what you are in essence are crying about. Think before you speak. Understand the context of your ill-informed opinions and thoughts and how they ring hollow in the face of the facts. It’s easy to say you don’t like something for the sheer sake of it’s outcome, but what you and other like you are advocating is defeat at the hands of an enemy that could care less about who you are, where you come from, how you think you can relate to them, how you think they will somehow adopt your sensibilities or any of that other stuff. They will see you as the pig infidel and then slice your throat like a pig at a roast and while your life blood oozes out of your throat what is your last thought going to be? Ooops, I’ve made a mistake? We only have one shot at this and it’s people like you that are blowing that shot.

  72. 72
    Jason Said:
    5:11 pm  [ Quote ]

    But does she speak for America or just the fringes?

    Shehan speaks for a small minority on the far left. Most centrist liberals like myself are as sick as her as most reasonable conservatives are sick of Coulter and Malkin.

  73. 73
    Rascal Said:
    5:13 pm  [ Quote ]

    I agree with you Asmodeus, these lunatics come out of the woodwork every 4 years with this montra, they are like little cockroaches.

    Asmodeus on July 6, 2006 at 4:58 pm said:

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 3:49 pm said:

    My family member who just had he legs blown off by a road side bomb and wonders why—I guess he is “only a few”. Or my uncle who suffered from PTSD and substance abuse for ten years after the horrors he saw during his ten month service in VietNam—that was worth it too. We can agree to disagree-

    There is no more agreement to disagree in this conflict. You want to be pacified by islamofascists because you want to cry like a spoiled child about your opinion on what bad foreign policy is when you’ve never read a single tract of anything remotely resembling a foreign policy? You want to hold up your wounded family members to the rest of us to make your argument that you don’t like this war, but support our troops because they are ordered to go fight a war against an enemy that collaborates and collaborated with those that attacked us? You want to use them to make your argument matter? You want to use them to justify your selfish preening position that no war is justifiable? If that’s the case, then which war is and why? It’s unfortunate that our soldiers are being maimed and over 2500 have given their lives for you to cry on a blog about it. It’s unfortunate that you seem to be on the cusp of being incapable of truly understanding the evil nature of the enemy we are fighting. If we lose this conflict because of people like you, you won’t get a choice about which foreign policy or which administration you don’t like because of it.

    You will be given the choice of convert or die. Sharia or oblivion. Is that what you want, because that is what you are in essence are crying about. Think before you speak. Understand the context of your ill-informed opinions and thoughts and how they ring hollow in the face of the facts. It’s easy to say you don’t like something for the sheer sake of it’s outcome, but what you and other like you are advocating is defeat at the hands of an enemy that could care less about who you are, where you come from, how you think you can relate to them, how you think they will somehow adopt your sensibilities or any of that other stuff. They will see you as the pig infidel and then slice your throat like a pig at a roast and while your life blood oozes out of your throat what is your last thought going to be? Ooops, I’ve made a mistake? We only have one shot at this and it’s people like you that are blowing that shot.

  74. 74
    Rascal Said:
    5:21 pm  [ Quote ]

    Jason on July 6, 2006 at 5:11 pm said:

    But does she speak for America or just the fringes?

    Shehan speaks for a small minority on the far left. Most centrist liberals like myself are as sick as her as most reasonable conservatives are sick of Coulter and Malkin.

    Jason I can’t say for sure but you sure don’t seem like a moderate you seem to be as far out on the left fringes as this Jackie and Sheehan is, I have seen your posts before and your not a moderate Liberal by any definition of that term.
    I do know any moderate Liberals, those are far and few between.
    Zell Miller is one Moderate Liberal that comes to mind, other than that, that’s about all that are around these days.
    You put Michelle Malkin in the same category as Ann Coulter, well the only thing that I can tell you is that Michelle would be quite proud to be in that category but she is not.

  75. 75
    DeadHead Said:
    5:22 pm  [ Quote ]

    Come on now, cant we all just agree to disagree? Group hug…come on now!

    Anyway, Sheehan and her associates in Code Pink have remolded their message so many times, Im not even sure what the original message was.

    I get so tired of seeing groups like that parading themselves through D.C. as if they are committing some courageous act on behalf of the downtrodden. If there is one place on earth that you will get a fair chance to make it, its right here in the United States.

    Dont bark out your demands and strut around taunting the police and the government here, not with the Constitution and the ACLU watching your back, do it in the real hell-holes of the world.

    Travel to Iraq and TRULY support Iraqi women, demand that the religious zealots give them equal rights and standings in the community. Dont do it here, do it there. Stand up for women also in Darfur and Syria and Iran and Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and North Korea and China and Somalia.

  76. 76
    WMD Maker Said:
    5:22 pm  [ Quote ]

    Asmodeus on July 6, 2006 at 4:58 pm said:

    Jackie on July 6, 2006 at 3:49 pm said:

    My family member who just had he legs blown off by a road side bomb and wonders why—I guess he is “only a few”. Or my uncle who suffered from PTSD and substance abuse for ten years after the horrors he saw during his ten month service in VietNam—that was worth it too. We can agree to disagree-

    There is no more agreement to disagree in this conflict. You want to be pacified by islamofascists because you want to cry like a spoiled child about your opinion on what bad foreign policy is when you’ve never read a single tract of anything remotely resembling a foreign policy? You want to hold up your wounded family members to the rest of us to make your argument that you don’t like this war, but support our troops because they are ordered to go fight a war against an enemy that collaborates and collaborated with those that attacked us? You want to use them to make your argument matter? You want to use them to justify your selfish preening position that no war is justifiable? If that’s the case, then which war is and why? It’s unfortunate that our soldiers are being maimed and over 2500 have given their lives for you to cry on a blog about it. It’s unfortunate that you seem to be on the cusp of being incapable of truly understanding the evil nature of the enemy we are fighting. If we lose this conflict because of people like you, you won’t get a choice about which foreign policy or which administration you don’t like because of it.

    You will be given the choice of convert or die. Sharia or oblivion. Is that what you want, because that is what you are in essence are crying about. Think before you speak. Understand the context of your ill-informed opinions and thoughts and how they ring hollow in the face of the facts. It’s easy to say you don’t like something for the sheer sake of it’s outcome, but what you and other like you are advocating is defeat at the hands of an enemy that could care less about who you are, where you come from, how you think you can relate to them, how you think they will somehow adopt your sensibilities or any of that other stuff. They will see you as the pig infidel and then slice your throat like a pig at a roast and while your life blood oozes out of your throat what is your last thought going to be? Ooops, I’ve made a mistake? We only have one shot at this and it’s people like you that are blowing that shot.

    Even after you convert you will be a second class person not even citizen because you we not born into the religion. If you are female you are still further down the ladder probably fourth or fifth class, I am not sure whether they put animals on a higher standing than converted women or not.

  77. 77
    db Said:
    5:44 pm  [ Quote ]

    Wow, Norah is an idiot. Obviously paid off by wingnut morons. I’ll bet she gets on top!

  78. 78
    Scooternyc Said:
    5:56 pm  [ Quote ]

    Jackie said I am against the war but I support the troups.I am against the war but I support the troups.

    This is a statement of incongruence. Soldiers volunteer to be part of the military, they take an oath, most of whom take very seriously, and thus their mission is:
    I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

    Their mission is who they are, if you know anything about someone in the military, you understand their allegiance to their country and its people.

    To try and side step the issue by doublespeak doesn’t wash. If you DON’T support the war, you could never support the troops. You could keep saying it but it won’t make it true.

    Patriot: one who loves his or her country and supports its authority and interests

    I know a lot of politicians like to use this phrase “I support the troops but not the war”, but its virtually impossible.

  79. 79
    Josef Said:
    5:58 pm  [ Quote ]

    miken on July 6, 2006 at 4:46 pm said:

    Josef on July 6, 2006 at 4:19 pm said:

    miken on July 6, 2006 at 2:49 pm said:

    Josef on July 6, 2006 at 1:34 pm said:

    I presume the attacks on MSNBC will stop sometime soon.

    Norah O’Donnell is one hottie on our side!!

    well josefHELL (haha another pun! teehee…) MSNBC is part of the terrorist networks and by even throwing any support their way you support communism, gay marriage, and abortion. why dont you go back to the taliban?

    You made absolutely no sense.

    The Taliban kills gays.

    why do you hate america?

    Now I “hate America” according to you.

    How did you draw that conclusion?

    MSNBC is an American news station that runs former US Republican Congressman Joe Scarborough and Norah O’Donnell who came from Roll Call and is married (DANG!).

    I don’t hate America. I hate dummy bigots like you.

  80. 80
    Hello Said:
    5:59 pm  [ Quote ]

    Jackie, why don’t you sign up and go to Darfur? I did my time in Desert Storm and was injured as well. The Best Man at our wedding had both of his legs blown off in Kosovo and while he wondered what the reason we were sent there he isn’t bitter. Yes, lots of people sufferred from PTSD after Viet Nam, look how you people on the left treated them. However, at least they came home. My brother didn’t but you didn’t see myself, my folks or my little brother spitting on anyone of my cousins who did come home unlike the kook cousins of mine who did and one who told my mother that her step-son (his mother was killed by a drunk driver when he was 3) deserved to die because he was a baby killer. Yeah, people can agree to disagree but get a grip on reality there are a lot of people who feel we’re doing the right thing. If you want to go to Darfur hook up with George Clooney and get a brigade of hollywood actors who play soldiers in movies and take care of the problem then.

  81. 81
    Scooternyc Said:
    6:01 pm  [ Quote ]

    I think Nora did a great job of making Cindy be accountable, I just wish she had more quotes about the President to throw at her to show examples of her trashing our President.

    Those of you who don’t like the war, I press this question to you:

    How would you handle the attacks on us then, that have occurred over time, the 1st WTC attack, the Cole, the 2nd WTC, the Pentagon, the crash of flight 93, the Oklahoma City bombing?

  82. 82
    Scooternyc Said:
    6:06 pm  [ Quote ]

    The other incongruency has to do with the press NOW asking Tony Snow:

    Helen Thomas: Do you accept the premise that was set forth here that the missile launching is bait because they want one-on-one talks? And if they did, what would be the objection? Surely the other five members would not object to the U.S. keeping them informed.

    Now, does the Democratic Party WANT President Bush to go it alone and exclude other nations?

    Or NOT go it alone and have global support?

    You can’t have it both ways! I find it so interesting that this is coming up regarding N. Korea, they sound so stupid.

  83. 83
    Jason Said:
    6:08 pm  [ Quote ]

    Rascal on July 6, 2006 at 5:21 pm said:

    Jason on July 6, 2006 at 5:11 pm said:

    But does she speak for America or just the fringes?

    Shehan speaks for a small minority on the far left. Most centrist liberals like myself are as sick as her as most reasonable conservatives are sick of Coulter and Malkin.

    Jason I can’t say for sure but you sure don’t seem like a moderate you seem to be as far out on the left fringes as this Jackie and Sheehan is, I have seen your posts before and your not a moderate Liberal by any definition of that term.
    I do know any moderate Liberals, those are far and few between.
    Zell Miller is one Moderate Liberal that comes to mind, other than that, that’s about all that are around these days.
    You put Michelle Malkin in the same category as Ann Coulter, well the only thing that I can tell you is that Michelle would be quite proud to be in that category but she is not.

    Show me some of my posts where I come off as a far left liberal like Shehan. I can tell you that you won’t, because I’m not.

    But then again, most conservatives here find that John McCain is a liberal, so by that standard I guess you would consider me a leftist.

    As I’ve said before, people on the far left and far right view anyone who doesn’t share their narrow political ideology as an exact opposite of themselves. Wingnuts view anyone who criticizes Bush handling of the country, his foreign policy, and the Iraq war as moonbats, while moonbats view anyone who is for a free economy and self reliance as a capitolist pig.

  84. 84
    Jason Said:
    6:19 pm  [ Quote ]

    Those of you who don’t like the war, I press this question to you:

    How would you handle the attacks on us then, that have occurred over time, the 1st WTC attack, the Cole, the 2nd WTC, the Pentagon, the crash of flight 93, the Oklahoma City bombing?

    Find those responsible and bring them to justice. The Bush administration should have put 150,000 troops into Afghanistan to round up every member of the Taliban and find OBL when they had the chance, not accuse Saddam Hussein of being involved in 9/11 and invade Iraq.

  85. 85
    Rascal Said:
    6:25 pm  [ Quote ]

    Jason on July 6, 2006 at 6:19 pm said:

    Those of you who don’t like the war, I press this question to you:

    How would you handle the attacks on us then, that have occurred over time, the 1st WTC attack, the Cole, the 2nd WTC, the Pentagon, the crash of flight 93, the Oklahoma City bombing?

    Find those responsible and bring them to justice. The Bush administration should have put 150,000 troops into Afghanistan to round up every member of the Taliban and find OBL when they had the chance, not accuse Saddam Hussein of being involved in 9/11 and invade Iraq.

    There were al-qeda in Iraq before we went to Iraq that is why, and sadam had training fasilities in Iraq for terrorism and suicide bombing training camps, even ask Christopher Hitchens.

  86. 86
    Mallard T. Drake Said:
    6:26 pm  [ Quote ]

    Shehan speaks for a small minority on the far left. Most centrist liberals like myself are as sick as her as most reasonable conservatives are sick of Coulter and Malkin.

    Where are the public denunciations of her from the “centerist liberals?” Let’s hear John Kerry disassociate himself from her. Oh, sorry…bad example.

    When Coulter’s latest book came out, she was brow-beaten by the left and questioned by some on the right about her tactic and language regarding the Jersey Moms. Where are the libs who are publicly questioning Sheehan’s tactics or message? the sound of crickets

  87. 87
    Mallard T. Drake Said:
    6:29 pm  [ Quote ]

    Find those responsible and bring them to justice. The Bush administration should have put 150,000 troops into Afghanistan to round up every member of the Taliban and find OBL when they had the chance, not accuse Saddam Hussein of being involved in 9/11 and invade Iraq.

    Show me the reference where The Bush administration accused Saddam of being involved with 9/11. That’s okay, I’ll wait…..........

  88. 88
    Hello Said:
    6:35 pm  [ Quote ]

    I’m not much of a fan of Coulter either and I think she could have gotten her point across without calling the Jersey girls “the Witches of East Brunswick”. She has a valid point but . . . However, I quit reading the book after she continually referred to a number of people as “retarded, retards”, etc. I think it’s one thing to discuss the people who put themselves out there and those of us who disagree with them receive outrage from those on the left by asking them questions while they ignore the families who don’t agree with the Jersey girls. It’s another thing though entirely for people like Coulter or anyone else to throw around the word “retarded”. People who are born retarded either through Down Syndrome or just by an “accident” of birth, cannot help that fact. It annoys me to no end when people cannot come up with other adjectives to use. Coulter is a smart woman but she needs to get a refesher vocabulary course.
    Does this make sense?

  89. 89
    The Texas Songbird Trackbacked With:
    6:39 pm  [ Quote ]

    Queen Moonbat Shrieks Again…

    While she looks no worse than usual, her ongoing hunger strike is obviously taking a mental toll on “America’s most outspoken anti-war activist,” Cindy Sheehan. The Moonbat Queen appeared on MSNBC last night, where guest Hardball hostess Norah O’Do…

  90. 90
    Mallard T. Drake Said:
    6:44 pm  [ Quote ]

    The Jersey Moms was only a small, small part of “Godless.” Much bigger was Coulter’s discussion and exposure of the “religion of Liberalism’s” reliance on Darwinism and evolution to justify just about everything they support and do. I am surprised there was no outcry about that, but then I suppose there were few libs that bothered to read the book.

    Sorry that this has strayed off-topic. Back to Cindy, the human-shield.

  91. 91
    Mallard T. Drake Said:
    6:45 pm  [ Quote ]

    BTW Jason, still waiting for the evidence that President Bush accused Saddam of being involved with 9/11…......................

  92. 92
    Rubin Said:
    6:54 pm  [ Quote ]

    gawd i hope the DemoCraps draft her for prez 2008.

  93. 93
    Hello Said:
    6:57 pm  [ Quote ]

    Yes, Mallard you’re correct but when she started throwing the “R” word around so much, I just stopped reading it. I do agree with her about how the teacher unions are destroying the schools. I’ve seen this more than ever out here in HI (the first state I’ve worked in where you’re compelled to join the union). There are a lot of lazy people who don’t do much more than pick up a paycheck.
    Rubin-maybe they’ll have her in Carter’s box next time or better yet on stage with the Code Pink nuts!

  94. 94
    Jackie Said:
    7:38 pm  [ Quote ]

    “To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”Theodore Roosevelt

  95. 95
    Jason Said:
    7:43 pm  [ Quote ]

    Mallard T. Drake on July 6, 2006 at 6:45 pm said:

    BTW Jason, still waiting for the evidence that President Bush accused Saddam of being involved with 9/11…......................

    Cheney said on Meet The Press that 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta met with Senior Iraqi military officials.

    How many times did Bush use the words 9/11, Al-Queda, Iraq, and Saddam Hussein in the same sentance during his speeches leading up to the war? Bush might never had explicitly stated that Saddam was connected to 9/11, but he implicitly made it clear that Saddam was connected to 9/11 that more than 60% of Americans believed it.

    Bush and Cheney also have stated that Saddam did not have ties to Al-Queda, but that hasn’t stopped conservatives saying he did.

  96. 96
    JWL Said:
    7:48 pm  [ Quote ]

    How many times did Bush use the words 9/11, Al-Queda, Iraq, and Saddam Hussein in the same sentance during his speeches leading up to the war? Bush might never had explicitly stated that Saddam was connected to 9/11, but he implicitly made it clear that Saddam was connected to 9/11 that more than 60% of Americans believed it.

    That’s because you liberals kept lying and claiming that “Bush said Saddam did 9/11!”, when he never said it. It’s similar to your lie that Bush said that “God wants me to be president,” and “God told me to attack Saddam.” He never said that stuff, either.

    His point was always clear to anyone who was paying attention (and wasn’t a liar, like you). In the POST-9/11 WORLD, it was too dangerous to leave a man like Saddam Hussein in power because he might provide terrorists such as AL-QAEDA with WMDs. This was always his point, and he never said any differently. As I said, that was a LIE you people made up.

  97. 97
    Mallard T. Drake Said:
    7:49 pm  [ Quote ]

    So, you admit the Bush administration never accused Saddam of being involved in 9/11, but you still criticize him for using that as an excuse to go to war. Hmmm. I don’t think that was the type of criticism that Teddy Roosevelt was referring to.

    As for Saddam and Al-Qaeda having ties, try starting by doing research on official Iraqi documents uncovered and translated that do tie the two together. (I’ll save you the trouble…having ties is not the same as Saddam being involved in 9/11, so you can relax.)

  98. 98
    Umnumzana Said:
    8:03 pm  [ Quote ]

    President Bush not only did not link Saddam to 9/11 explicitly, on several occasions I recall him saying clearly that Saddam was not involved.

    We keep going over the same points over and over again to no purpose. There were WMD’s there, there were not WMD’s. Saddam was looking for yellowcake; he was not looking for yellowcake. Everyone is talking and no one is listening.

    At that time virtually all the world’s intelligence agencies said Saddam had WMD’s, we know he used WMD’s on his own people and Iranians, we know he had recently attacked Kuwait and had designs on Saudi Arabia, we know he financed Hamas and terrorism; we know that he was a destabilizing force in the Middle East, with special hatred for Israel, we know that he hindered U.N. Inspections, we know he violated 17 U.N. Resolutions, we know he behaved as if he had WMD’s and was hiding them, and since the war we know that most of his top generals believed Saddam had a WMD stockpile.

    No matter what we think we know now, and no matter what our opinions about the war are now; at that time, with the information available; President Bush, the United States Congress, Tony Blair and Britain, and many allies; all evaluating the same data believed Saddam had to be removed from power. That is reality!

    Hindsight, Armchair quarter backing and playing General from in front of our computers or t