(via Drudge):
Coulter ‘is one of the leading political writers of our age… says something about the rest of us…
NYT: ONCE again, Ann Coulter has a book in need of flogging, and once again, people are stunned by what a “vicious,” “mean-spirited,” “despicable” “hate-monger” they say she is.Ms. Coulter, who seems afflicted by a kind of rhetorical compulsion, most recently labeled the widows of 9/11 “harpies.” It is just one in a series from a spoken-word hit parade that seems to fly out of her mouth uninterrupted by conscience, rectitude or logic.
But Ann Coulter knows precisely what she is saying. Her current book, “Godless: The Church of Liberalism,” is heading to the best-seller lists in part because she has a significant constituency and in part because no other author in American publishing is better at weaponizing words. With five books and more than a million copies in hardcover sales, she plays to win and is happy to take hostages along the way, including the women she calls “The Witches of East Brunswick.”
Independent Conservative linked with Ann Coulter’s “Godless” Makes the Liberals’ Heads Spin With Obfuscation! (Audio)...
pretend pundit linked with Matt Drudge Interviews Ann Coulter (mp3)...
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Register to comment here.
1:15 pm [ Quote ]
YAY for the NY Times! It is about time that they noticed the big fat lying liars who lie and are a discredit to discourse, those lying assholes!
1:17 pm [ Quote ]
Hurray for my paper! We have finally broken away from our conservative roots and attacked one of our own. Now if we could only lay off of our enemies like Cindy Sheehan and Al Franken, we could be considered a mainstream paper instead of a right-wing juggernaut
1:19 pm [ Quote ]
How many times must we be confronted with free speech before we take action? I mean, Coulter insulted grandstanding politically-motivated widows! Is nothing sacred?
1:35 pm [ Quote ]
“no other … is better at weaponizing words”
Umm, I would just refer you to Ian’s previous post about the Phelps church!
1:35 pm [ Quote ]
What, no “Liberal Hate”? You’re slipping.
1:55 pm [ Quote ]
Coulter skewered the Left’s sacred cow of grief pimping and boy are they squealing!
2:04 pm [ Quote ]
Now hold on a dang minute here. Did I understand that Ms. Coulter asked these widers to appear in Playboy? Now ain’t that a hoot.
I’ll tell you what-I’d sure like to see Ms. Coulter in that there magazine.
You betcha.
God fearing as always,
Red
2:05 pm [ Quote ]
Coulter. What a pig.
2:06 pm [ Quote ]
I can’t add anything to this as it’s spot on – “Ann Coulter has a book in need of flogging, and once again, people are stunned by what a “vicious,” “mean-spirited,” “despicable” “hate-monger” she really is.
——————————
FOX NEWS ALERT
Full Time:- USA 0 Czech republic 3
2:30 pm [ Quote ]
I think it is important to point out how well the book is selling. Is this because all conservatives are evil? Is it because only middle america is buying it? I think it may have to do with the fact that all news organizations have been giving this book so much air time that people want to read it now. Coulter was brilliant in this regard, they didnt have to pay for advertising and instead the MSM did it for her. No matter if you like her or hate her, if you buy the book she still makes money. I havent heard any book publicized this much since the da vinci code.
2:32 pm [ Quote ]
So, sinking to depths beneath hell are OK, as long as it sells!
Brilliant!
2:33 pm [ Quote ]
Damn Czechs! Haven’t they heard God is on our side? Anywho, Ms. Coulter needs a sandwich but apparantly figured out how to get paid: be as mean and shrill as she thinks the other side acts. Out-mean the meanies and make a killing on the punditry circuit. Never mind if she can write, if the message sells. One thing, unless she commits to some serious sammich time, I’ll cancel my subscription if Hugh puts her bony butt in Playboy.
2:44 pm [ Quote ]
Not that soccer has ANYTHING to do with this. But thank you for putting your true feelings into numbers.
Rooting against the USA? I would have never guessed! That is the difference between the two of us. I would root for my ally to win. The only time I would not root for England would be if they were playing the US.
Were you praying for the American athletes during the Olympics to lose? I can only assume so.
Thanks for making it clear you want the US to lose in everything! It is a sad commentary upon you.
So I guess you will no longer be complaining about Fox News? With that statement I suppose you can no longer claim they are in the right-wing’s pocket. Correct, or no?
2:45 pm [ Quote ]
The liberals squeal again! (Big surprise there)
As Ann put it so succinctly, hunting’s not as much fun when the rabbit has the gun.
2:46 pm [ Quote ]
Wow, I love Ann, but she probably should not have taken the jersey girls hostage. Does anyone know if she let them go? Is there ransom involved?
The first chapter of her book is great though. Can’t wait to read the rest.
2:47 pm [ Quote ]
It looks like Gerry Springer and/or WWF type of characters have set the norm for the US of A. License to speak anything without consequence or consideration has taken over for an absent discretion and it’s getting ugly by the day…....and that’s where we stand at this crossroad in our short history.
2:47 pm [ Quote ]
Wow, the NYT never ceases to amaze me.
3:01 pm [ Quote ]
mdconservative Said:
2:44 pm [ Quote ]
“Not that soccer has ANYTHING to do with this. But thank you for putting your true feelings into numbers.
Rooting against the USA? I would have never guessed! That is the difference between the two of us. I would root for my ally to win. The only time I would not root for England would be if they were playing the US.”
mdconservative what the hell are you talking about that was the final score. How do I put it in a pro-American way? Czech republic 3 USA 0 Nope still the same.
May be Fox will manage to spin a win out of it.
3:01 pm [ Quote ]
Aha, the NYT (proven lies, plaigerizing reporters, bias, etc) attempts to take the high ground. Heck, the “high ground” for them would still require a mile climb to reach sea level. May the flies from Michael Moore come to rest in their cappuchino.
3:15 pm [ Quote ]
From the desk of Ann Coulter:
The thesis of “Godless” is: Liberalism IS a religion. The liberal religion has its own cosmology, its own explanation for why we are here, its own gods, its own clergy. The basic tenet of liberalism is that nature is god and men are monkeys. (Except not as pure-hearted as actual monkeys, who don’t pollute, make nukes or believe in God.)
Liberals deny, of course, that liberalism is a religion — otherwise, they’d lose their government funding. “Separation of church and state” means separation of YOUR church from the state, but total unity between their church and the state.
I’m an atheist who believes in evolution, but she’s got an excellent point. We lost a lot of rights when the judges changed the first amendment’s wording from “freedom of religion” to “freedom from religion”. You’d think that would bother people who are into civil liberty. Guess not.
Three cheers for Ann Coulter!
3:40 pm [ Quote ]
Look at the stock price of the NYT.
It truly does represent the success of the anti-American left.
4:18 pm [ Quote ]
Ann Coulter Accused Of Plagiarism…Rove and those meddlesome sticky fingers are rumored to be behind the smears against The Rude Pundit….breaking news
http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2006/06/because-some-things-are-more-profane.html
4:20 pm [ Quote ]
Pathetic. So friggin’ pathetic. Irony is dead, as is respect, obviously. If Coulter’s ravings are what pass for discourse in today’s society, small wonder you clowns can’t tell when Limbaugh is OxyMan.
4:22 pm [ Quote ]
HappySmokerUK Said:
2:06 pm [ Quote ]
FOX NEWS ALERT
Full Time:- USA 0 Czech republic 3
That because all of our good athletes play baseball, football, basketball and hockey only the rejects play soccer you know the ones that couldn’t make it in a real sport.
4:28 pm [ Quote ]
TheRightSider Said:
“That because all of our good athletes play baseball”
Its funny because if you can’t play football/rugby/cricket…etc over here you end up playing rounders (baseball)
4:31 pm [ Quote ]
Hitting a 95 mph fastball that is moving is the hardest thing to do in sports.
4:42 pm [ Quote ]
Hitting a 95 mph fastball that is moving is the hardest thing to do in sports.
I’d also add that hitting a fast bowler bowling at 90-100mph is equally as hard in cricket. (ball also swings in flight)
By the way a cricket ball is solid unlike the tennis ball used when Bush tried his hand at cricket.
4:46 pm [ Quote ]
Ann Coulter Accused Of Plagiarism…Rove and those meddlesome sticky fingers are rumored to be behind the smears against The Rude Pundit….breaking news
http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2006/06/because-some-things-are-more-profane.html
That’s too good, If I had the bullypulpit I too would smear all those leftist as well. rudepundit is a leftist blog and I would gladly smear him too.
4:48 pm [ Quote ]
Hitting a 95 mph fastball that is moving is the hardest thing to do in sports.
I’d also add that hitting a fast bowler bowling at 90-100mph is equally as hard in cricket. (ball also swings in flight)
By the way a cricket ball is solid unlike the tennis ball used when Bush tried his hand at cricket.
John Kerry throws a baseball like a little girlie man. LOL
4:55 pm [ Quote ]
Liberal attack style #47. Accuse conservatives of something and then act like it’s true. Lies are as acceptable as fact, since you just need an accusation.
4:55 pm [ Quote ]
Liberals Are…Said
“John Kerry throws a baseball like a little girlie man. LOL”
Sounds like he’ll be joining the Dick Cheney team of girlie throwers then.
5:13 pm [ Quote ]
Matt Drudge Interviews Ann Coulter (mp3)...
Matt Drudge’s Sunday evening broadcast is recorded in real time and presented in beautiful low-fidelity mp3 format—perfect for those of us who cannot stay up until 1 AM on a school night.
LISTEN TO THE ARCHIVES:
» 9:30 segment (on WABC only) ...
5:30 pm [ Quote ]
pretend pundit
“for those of us who cannot stay up until 1 AM on a school night.”
Glad to see you haven’t been indoctrinated with lefty thoughts by all those evil left wing teachers out there yet.
5:32 pm [ Quote ]
It’s just kinda funny the only thing the lefties can do is point out “bad” things about those who irritate them the most.
Coulter is a mean person, Limbaugh is an “Oxyman” or drug addict.
Granted I feel Coulter’s comments were a little unnecessary, but look at the coverage she’s getting now. She still makes undeniable and truthful points as does Limbaugh.
They absoutley can not argue with truth or facts. The only thing they can do is to resort to mudslinging in an attempt to discredit them.
Facts hurt, Truth hurts worse. . .
5:50 pm [ Quote ]
Liberals Are…Said
“John Kerry throws a baseball like a little girlie man. LOL”
Sounds like he’ll be joining the Dick Cheney team of girlie throwers then.
Hey ( hippiesmoker girlie man ) for your info Dick Cheyney can throw a Baseball like George Bush, like a professional not like John ( The Girlie Man ) Kerry – ( Ferry )
5:53 pm [ Quote ]
Liberals Are…Said
“John Kerry throws a baseball like a little girlie man. LOL”
Sounds like he’ll be joining the Dick Cheney team of girlie throwers then.
Hey hippiesmoker girlie man you are a woose.
6:13 pm [ Quote ]
HappySmokerUK Said:
4:28 pm [ Quote ]
TheRightSider Said:
“That because all of our good athletes play baseball”
Its funny because if you can’t play football/rugby/cricket…etc over here you end up playing rounders (baseball)
Why dont you wimps play real football?
6:17 pm [ Quote ]
Liberal attack style #47. Accuse conservatives of something and then act like it’s true. Lies are as acceptable as fact, since you just need an accusation.
Coulter: The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric project proposed on upper St. John River in Maine, was halted by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant previously believed to be extinct.
Portland Press Herald: The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric project proposed on upper St. John River, is halted by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant believed to be extinct.
Sure looks like plagarism to me. But since conservatives defended Ben Domenech, I’m sure you’ll disagree.
6:19 pm [ Quote ]
HappySmokerUK Said:
4:28 pm [ Quote ]
TheRightSider Said:
“That because all of our good athletes play baseball”
Its funny because if you can’t play football/rugby/cricket…etc over here you end up playing rounders (baseball)
Why dont you wimps play real football?
Hi TheRightSider I love playing football, in fact I love playing the sport more than watching it being played.
6:21 pm [ Quote ]
Liberal attack style #47. Accuse conservatives of something and then act like it’s true. Lies are as acceptable as fact, since you just need an accusation.
Coulter: The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric project proposed on upper St. John River in Maine, was halted by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant previously believed to be extinct.
Portland Press Herald: The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric project proposed on upper St. John River, is halted by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant believed to be extinct.
Sure looks like plagarism to me. But since conservatives defended Ben Domenech, I’m sure you’ll disagree.
Since Liberals Defend those Like Al Frankenstein that could be said for Liberals as well.
6:24 pm [ Quote ]
What the Hell is a British prick doing meddling in the affairs of the USA? How about worrying about the commie mayor of London, Galloway, or the hundreds of Jihadists in your midst there “DickSmokerUK”? I guess it is easier to look across the Atlantic!
6:27 pm [ Quote ]
TheRightSider Said:
“Why dont you wimps play real football?”
The nearest thing to “football” we play is rugby. But main difference is we play rugby like men unlike you wimps in the US who need crash helmets padding and all the rest.
6:27 pm [ Quote ]
What the Hell is a British prick doing meddling in the affairs of the USA? How about worrying about the commie mayor of London, Galloway, or the hundreds of Jihadists in your midst there “DickSmokerUK”? I guess it is easier to look across the Atlantic!
Couldn’t have said it better Brit Libs Blow.
6:29 pm [ Quote ]
TheRightSider Said:
“Why dont you wimps play real football?”
The nearest thing to “football” we play is rugby. But main difference is we play rugby like men unlike you wimps in the US who need crash helmets padding and all the rest.
Hey DickSmokerUK, the reason that we use helmets is because we are tougher and meaner when we play the sport unlike you limp wristed Liberals.
6:34 pm [ Quote ]
TheRightSider Said:
“Why dont you wimps play real football?”
The nearest thing to “football” we play is rugby. But main difference is we play rugby like men unlike you wimps in the US who need crash helmets padding and all the rest.
News flash update for you DickSmokerUK, the USA kicks butt so much that we had to save you scrawny little Liberal bent wristed butts from being taken over by the Nazis in ww11. If it wasn’t for the good ole’ USofA you little woosies would have been speaking german or you would have been a lampshade.
6:41 pm [ Quote ]
Jason. . .
Look CLOSELY at what the statements say. While the original is talking current or present time, Coulters is talking past time. Basically she has just restated what was already stated – just in past tense.
6:42 pm [ Quote ]
Since Liberals Defend those Like Al Frankenstein that could be said for Liberals as well.
Anne Coulter is accused of lifting entire passages from other people’s work. Al Franken was accused of lifting one metaphor from a passage.
6:45 pm [ Quote ]
Liberals Are…said
News flash update for you DickSmokerUK, the USA kicks butt so much that we had to save you scrawny little Liberal bent wristed butts from being taken over by the Nazis in ww11.
But as with WW1 you turned up late.
This still doesnt help your case about using Nancey-Boy crash helmets+Padding to play “football”
6:47 pm [ Quote ]
Jason. . .
Look CLOSELY at what the statements say. While the original is talking current or present time, Coulters is talking past time. Basically she has just restated what was already stated – just in past tense.
I’d suggest you look up what plagarism is. Paraphrasing a paragraph without citing the source is plagarism – anyone who’s written a high school paper knows that.
7:00 pm [ Quote ]
HappySmokerUK Said:
6:27 pm [ Quote ]
TheRightSider Said:
“Why dont you wimps play real football?”
The nearest thing to “football” we play is rugby. But main difference is we play rugby like men unlike you wimps in the US who need crash helmets padding and all the rest.
Yea, send some of your rugby players over or send them to the “lesser” NFL “world league” IF you had any idea as to the athleticism and size of a real football player.
7:15 pm [ Quote ]
Jason. . .
Look CLOSELY at what the statements say. While the original is talking current or present time, Coulters is talking past time. Basically she has just restated what was already stated – just in past tense.
I’d suggest you look up what plagarism is. Paraphrasing a paragraph without citing the source is plagarism – anyone who’s written a high school paper knows that.
Dude, she’s repeating a NEWS article, NOT a scholarly work. If you can find it in 3 places it is considered common knowledge, and I’m pretty sure if that rare and likely useless plant shut down a public works project, its in more than one place.
7:19 pm [ Quote ]
The “wimp” chain of sports
American Football players think Soccer players are wimps
Rugby players think American Football players are wimps
Aussie Rules Footy players KNOW everybody else are wimps
7:41 pm [ Quote ]
Jason. . .
Look CLOSELY at what the statements say. While the original is talking current or present time, Coulters is talking past time. Basically she has just restated what was already stated – just in past tense.
I’d suggest you look up what plagarism is. Paraphrasing a paragraph without citing the source is plagarism – anyone who’s written a high school paper knows that.
Dude, she’s repeating a NEWS article, NOT a scholarly work. If you can find it in 3 places it is considered common knowledge, and I’m pretty sure if that rare and likely useless plant shut down a public works project, its in more than one place.
Are you serious? You obviously don’t have a clue what plagarism is – I’d suggest you look up what plagarism is in a writing guide.
7:57 pm [ Quote ]
Like several others posting here, I am not in favor of Ann Coulter using incendiary language to make her points against the four 911 widows; however, do you honestly think her book would have gotten this much attention and started out @ #1 on the Times bestseller list if she had not used such language? So, because she had excellent points to make about these particular women, she was able to get people to talk about them because she used language designed to incite strong, passionate reactions.
What is being lost is this: (a) These women would not have been heard at all and been promoted by the MSM if they were not liberals willing to attack President Bus. (b) These women at tax payer expense became wealthy. (c) Because of their hatred of Bush and their liberal beliefs, these women have enjoyed a certain amount of notoriety, and much more than their 15 minutes of fame. (d) So, while it may be grossly unfair to say these widows are ‘enjoying’ their spouse’s deaths, I think it is fair to say they have benefited in many ways and are enjoying those benefits.
Ann could have used more temperate language in describing these women, but among the tens of thousands of books published yearly in this country; if she had, I doubt the book would have gotten this much attention. Lastly, I believe the Democrats are defending these ladies and trotting them out, because they are daring people to criticize so-called war widows, and therefore they hope to control the debate and silence their detractors.
8:17 pm [ Quote ]
Bah. The jersey girls lost their right to be outraged at others when they lambasted Bush. If you ridicule someone else with inaccurate statements, you should accept ridicule sent back at you. No, you should expect it.
We should all feel sorry for these women, or anyone who loses a loved one. At least until they use that loss to get something for themselves (in this case, they wanted to get Kerry elected). That is sleazy, plain and simple. Yes, they used their husband’s deaths to promote an agenda. S-L-E-A-Z-Y.
I’ve no more respect for these women than I do for Cindy Sheehan. Narcisists blow, and Ann just exposed 4 more. Bless that brave woman.
8:21 pm [ Quote ]
I declare that Umnumzana wins the debate hands down, he does this with such ease and little effort, and I agree with the way that he put it.
Way to go Umnumzana.
8:25 pm [ Quote ]
Also Kevin you are right too, but I think that Umnumzana was saying the same thing but not in a incendiary way. I have to agree with Ann Coulter on the fact that she is educated and she does know just how to get on the Liberal cases enough to make her point.
8:28 pm [ Quote ]
Yeah Umnazumna always says things cleaner and clearer than I do. It’s one of the things I hate about him
8:28 pm [ Quote ]
ps. it’s ‘lobotomized’
8:29 pm [ Quote ]
But I agree with the sentiment most of the time
8:31 pm [ Quote ]
Kevin as usual you are correct again, I forgot to use my spell checker LOL
8:33 pm [ Quote ]
The New York Times is unbelievably hypocritical to complain about Coulter. Doesn’t Maureen Dowd work for that paper?
Anyway, thanks for helping Coulter rocket to number one in book sales, libs. Keep it up, and maybe she’ll sell one million copies of ‘Godless’.
8:34 pm [ Quote ]
In case anyone wondering about Ann Coulters fine education and brilliants.
Ann Coulter is the author of four New York Times bestsellers —How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must)(October, 2004), Treason: Liberal Treachery From the Cold War to the War on Terrorism (June 2003); Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right (June 2002); and High Crimes and Misdemeanors:The Case Against Bill Clinton (August 1998).
Coulter is the legal correspondent for Human Events and writes a popular syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate. She is a frequent guest on many TV shows, including Hannity and Colmes, Wolf Blitzer Reports, At Large With Geraldo Rivera, Scarborough Country, HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher, The O’Reilly Factor, Good Morning America and has been profiled in numerous publications, including TV Guide, the Guardian (UK), the New York Observer, National Journal, Harper’s Bazaar, and Elle magazine, among others. She was named one of the top 100 Public Intellectuals by federal judge Richard Posner in 2001.
Coulter clerked for the Honorable Pasco Bowman II of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and was an attorney in the Department of Justice Honors Program for outstanding law school graduates.
After practicing law in private practice in New York City, Coulter worked for the Senate Judiciary Committee, where she handled crime and immigration issues for Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan. From there, she became a litigator with the Center For Individual Rights in Washington, DC, a public interest law firm dedicated to the defense of individual rights with particular emphasis on freedom of speech, civil rights, and the free exercise of religion.
A Connecticut native, Coulter graduated with honors from Cornell University School of Arts & Sciences, and received her J.D. from University of Michigan Law School, where she was an editor of The Michigan Law Review.
REPORTERS WHO ARE ALLOWED TO INTERVIEW ANN AGAIN:
John Cloud, Time Magazine Ms Right
Jonathan Freedland of The Guardian An Appalling Magic
Jamie Glasov of Frontpage Magazine Frontpage Interview: Ann Coulter
8:43 pm [ Quote ]
Umnumzana nice post
I still think it’s abhorrent what Coulter wrote deliberately and for no other reason but to stir up controversy to generate book sales.
8:47 pm [ Quote ]
Umnumzana nice post
I still think it’s abhorrent what Coulter wrote deliberately and for no other reason but to stir up controversy to generate book sales.
What the heck are you talking about you yourself talk about Bush in a incendiary way so I guess the same could be said about you except for the fact that you are not intelligent enough to write a book.
8:48 pm [ Quote ]
“Glad to see you haven’t been indoctrinated with lefty thoughts by all those evil left wing teachers out there yet.”
Hey, you finally understand our schools, Happy. Fantastic. For once we agree on something!
9:15 pm [ Quote ]
Liberals Are…Said
“What the heck are you talking about you yourself talk about Bush in a incendiary way so I guess the same could be said about you”
The only difference is I’m not doing this to make money and I’m not denigrating and demonizing 9/11 widows to make a point.
9:38 pm [ Quote ]
With what Liberals Are Lobotomized Brain Dead Zombies included as his post, do you not think she would have already thought of that possibility? Not to mention it could be another “intentional” mis-hap to provoke a response as a marketing ploy.
But. . .
Here is some food for thought.
http://library.csusm.edu/plagiarism/howtoavoid/how_avoid_common.htm
How to Avoid Plagiarism
Common Knowledge
There is no clear boundary on what is considered common knowledge. Even experts on plagiarism disagree on what counts as common knowledge. For instance, many sources only consider facts — current and historical events, famous people, geographic areas, etc. — to be potentially common knowledge. Others also include nonfactual material such as folklore and common sayings. Some sources limit common knowledge to only information known by others in your class, other sources look at what is common knowledge for the broader subject area.
The two criteria that are most commonly used in deciding whether or not something is common knowledge relate to quantity: the fact can be found in numerous places and ubiquity: it is likely to be known by a lot of people. Ideally both conditions are true. A third criteria that is sometimes used is whether the information can be easily found in a general reference source.
How do you tell if you have met the quantity criteria? Some experts say that a fact is common knowledge if it can be found in three independent sources. Purdue’s Online Writing Lab recommends finding five independent sources before considering a fact common knowledge. The point is that common knowledge can be found in a variety of sources. As you do more research on a topic, you are likely to discover which facts count as common knowledge because you will encounter these facts in many places.
How do you tell if a fact is ubiquitous? Some facts may be well known within one discipline and papers written within that group may assume the information is commonly known. That same piece of information used in other situations or by ‘non-experts’ may require attribution. A good rule of thumb is to acknowledge ideas which are not common knowledge among your peers such as the other students in the course for which you are writing the paper.
How do you know if it is a general reference source? Reference sources collect together facts for easy look-up. Dictionaries, encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers are typical examples. Reference sources that focus on a specific area are not considered ‘general.’ The definition of Marfan syndrome mentioned previously came from a medical dictionary, a specialized reference source, that may not be readily available to most people. Therefore, you would probably want to cite this source if you were writing for people not familiar with medical information.
9:40 pm [ Quote ]
TheRightSider Said:
“That because all of our good athletes play baseball”
WHEN they’re not honking-up on steroids, drive-by shooting their neighbors and/or dealers and/or pimps, or thug-punching their illegitimate-offspring’s mothers, that is.
9:47 pm [ Quote ]
More good news from happysmoker! It’s ok to use inflamatory speech, as long as you don’t make any money off of it. Yay!
Unfortunately, you also can’t demonize people who have suffered tragedy and then used that tragedy to demonize others. I don’t really understand why, but apparently if you suffer a tragedy, you can demonize whoever you want, and no one is allowed to question you. It’s liberal science, so don’t expect it to make too much sense.
In other news, Ann Coulter continues to rock.
9:55 pm [ Quote ]
Here’s another good one ShaunS!
How to avoid the plague.
1. Stay away from rats.
2. Avoid fleas, especially the type that bleed rats.
That’s about it really. I’m not sure what plagues and plagiarism have to do with this post, but both are very good things to keep in mind if you are about to die of the plague, or steal someone’s words.
Also, how do you avoid getting stabbed in the chest with your own scissors?
1- Don’t run with scissors.
That’s more good general info.
9:57 pm [ Quote ]
Most of you right wingers on here are probably god-fearing folk.
So do you think God would fully agree with the statement Coulter made about the 9/11 widows?
9:58 pm [ Quote ]
I am watching on Hannity and Colmes right now with Coulter and some Assemblyman (his name escapes me and now they moved on) going head to head. I hope Ian posts this later. She is just smoking this guy and his arguments as well as all the other critics speaking out against her.
9:59 pm [ Quote ]
Liberals Are…Said
“What the heck are you talking about you yourself talk about Bush in a incendiary way so I guess the same could be said about you”
The only difference is I’m not doing this to make money and I’m not denigrating and demonizing 9/11 widows to make a point.
Hey Happy Hippy, Ann Coulter didn’t do it to all the Widows only those four who used their fame given to them by the Liberal MSM to make their case because they happened to be Liberals as well and that they used that to be incendiary on Bush and Ann Coulter just clarrified that.
So put that in your Pot Pipe and smoke it.
10:00 pm [ Quote ]
Most of you right wingers on here are probably god-fearing folk.
So do you think God would fully agree with the statement Coulter made about the 9/11 widows?
Referr To Comment 74
10:10 pm [ Quote ]
That’s pretty funny Kevin but I was only trying to point out some guidelines about plagiarism. I am trying to show what can be considered common knowledge versus intentional plagiarism by using valid sites as sources.
10:15 pm [ Quote ]
That’s pretty funny Kevin but I was only trying to point out some guidelines about plagiarism. I am trying to show what can be considered common knowledge versus intentional plagiarism by using valid sites as sources.
But ShawnS that can also be viewed as evidence when you point to a site as well.
10:21 pm [ Quote ]
Yes you are correct. However, I see it as evidence to support what I am saying so I am not portrayed as a “liar”.
10:25 pm [ Quote ]
Coulter is a pig.
10:25 pm [ Quote ]
or to give credibility.
10:30 pm [ Quote ]
Coulter is a pig.
Anon1 you mirror that very statement.
10:36 pm [ Quote ]
Coulter is a pig.
Anon1 in case you couldn’t figure that out that means that you are the one who is The Pig.
10:38 pm [ Quote ]
Oops Shawn, I thought you were insinuating that Coulter was a plagiarist or something as the accuse-mongering left often does. Please accept my apologies.
Smoker, you really don’t know your audience. I’m sure a lot of people here are god-fearing. But it is very doubtful that they would look to you for spiritual guidance.
For those of us who are not religious, your statement is valueless, except to point out that you believe that God doesn’t want the truth told, unless it’s said with political correctness. If you’ve read the bible, you’d know that God is not pc, even slightly. He’s all about right and wrong. Ann’s right, her detractors are wrong. Yes, God would be on Ann’s side.
10:39 pm [ Quote ]
I see that the Brits think the biggest problem in the world today is Coulter. Too bad they missed George Galloway at an Islamonazi hate fest.
Red Ken Livingstone is a commie who loves Hugo Chaves and doesn’t flush his toilet in an attempt to save the world one flush at a time.
Crazed Imams hold London by the neck as the Brits try to find newer and better ways to grovel.
Keep worrying about Coulter DickSmokerUK. Before you know it the book will be banned in your country and you will be forcibly converting to Islam.
10:50 pm [ Quote ]
Liberals Are… Your a pork Chop…And as for Brit Dick… your just a squawking haggis.
10:52 pm [ Quote ]
Ann Coulter’s “Godless” Makes the Liberals’ Heads Spin With Obfuscation! (Audio)...
Ann Coulter’s new book Godless: The Church of Liberalism is about how Liberalism has literally become a state enforced form of faith. Coulter says this herself in her own review of her book. (She did her own review because she knew Liberal le…
10:53 pm [ Quote ]
Liberals Are… Your a pork Chop…And as for Brit Dick… your just a squawking haggis.
So happy hippy you think that all Americans are idiots huh, yes I do know what haggis is, you think that we don’t know a thing over here, well I got news for you, you are Rocky Mountain Oysters so how do you like them apples.
10:54 pm [ Quote ]
Most of you right wingers on here are probably god-fearing folk.
So do you think God would fully agree with the statement Coulter made about the 9/11 widows?
He is not happy about most of the things we say, think and do (me included); but He loves every human being as His special Creation, and Jesus loves us enough that despite what a mess we can so often be, He accepts us and loves us unconditionally, He died and rose again to prove it.
10:59 pm [ Quote ]
Umnumzana you are right, and you come through with all the correct statements and so that you know I appreciate that a lot.
Thanks Umnumzana
11:01 pm [ Quote ]
It’s only 5 months until Haggis season. http://haggishunt.scotsman.com/
Liberals Are… I’ll say yes to a steak any day but no thanks I’ll pass on the testicles.
11:03 pm [ Quote ]
OK, I’ve had enough of this LIE which is all over the media about how ‘Coulter says such and such about 9/11 widows.’ She isn’t talking about ALL 9/11 widows.
Coulter is talking about Kristin Breitweiser, Lorie Van Auken, Mindy Kleinberg and Patty Casazza.
Coulter is not talking about ANY OTHER 9/11 widows. Stop LYING, please.
11:07 pm [ Quote ]
It’s only 5 months until Haggis season. http://haggishunt.scotsman.com/
Liberals Are… I’ll say yes to a steak any day but no thanks I’ll pass on the testicles.
Haggis is a scottish dish alright but Haggis is not a critter it is sheep stomach stuffed with barley and some other ingredients.
11:11 pm [ Quote ]
OK, I’ve had enough of this LIE which is all over the media about how ‘Coulter says such and such about 9/11 widows.’ She isn’t talking about ALL 9/11 widows.
Coulter is talking about Kristin Breitweiser, Lorie Van Auken, Mindy Kleinberg and Patty Casazza.
Coulter is not talking about ANY OTHER 9/11 widows. Stop LYING, please.
JWL I beleive that I have said the same thing except that I couldn’t remember their names, I only mentioned that there were four from New Jersey that Coulter was referring to.
11:13 pm [ Quote ]
It’s only 5 months until Haggis season. http://haggishunt.scotsman.com/
Liberals Are… I’ll say yes to a steak any day but no thanks I’ll pass on the testicles.
Haggis is a scottish dish alright but Haggis is not a critter it is sheep stomach stuffed with barley and some other ingredients.
Well it was worth a try…You normally get one
Well I don’t know what the world is coming to apparently there is something called Americanized Haggis (Roll eyes)
11:23 pm [ Quote ]
It’s only 5 months until Haggis season. http://haggishunt.scotsman.com/
Liberals Are… I’ll say yes to a steak any day but no thanks I’ll pass on the testicles.
Haggis is a scottish dish alright but Haggis is not a critter it is sheep stomach stuffed with barley and some other ingredients.
Well it was worth a try…You normally get one
Well I don’t know what the world is coming to apparently there is something called Americanized Haggis (Roll eyes)
I don’t think that I would try the Americanized Haggis either much less the original from Scottland.
11:52 pm [ Quote ]
Liberal attack style #47. Accuse conservatives of something and then act like it’s true. Lies are as acceptable as fact, since you just need an accusation.
Coulter: The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric project proposed on upper St. John River in Maine, was halted by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant previously believed to be extinct.
Portland Press Herald: The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric project proposed on upper St. John River, is halted by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant believed to be extinct.
Sure looks like plagarism to me. But since conservatives defended Ben Domenech, I’m sure you’ll disagree.
Sure looks like plagarism to me.
Ooh I just plagiarized you! Get a grip dude. Facts are not plagiarizable.
11:58 pm [ Quote ]
If those 4 women blamed Clinton as well for their husbands’ deaths, perhaps they would’ve come across as sincere. THEY DIDN’T! They are nothing but political pimps. Ann Coulter did more to excite our base than we realize. Conservatives=logic Liberals=emotion
12:06 am [ Quote ]
If those 4 women blamed Clinton as well for their husbands’ deaths, perhaps they would’ve come across as sincere. THEY DIDN’T! They are nothing but political pimps. Ann Coulter did more to excite our base than we realize. Conservatives=logic Liberals=emotion
You are correct The Watcher, they didn’t critisize Clinton and if they had they wouldn’t have been held up by the MSM either.
1:12 am [ Quote ]
Ms.Coulter is right on the money and any
Catholic or related religious person who is shocked by her comments should know that the wool has been over your eyes for too long.You might as well
believe that there is such a thing as Judeo-christian?
The historical fabricators of history even have some people thinking the Jews and christians have some
thing in common.We dont. Jesus was not a jew nor
a rabbi ! iF you really want to know the truth,check out the written story by a Priest in 1886 named Don
Felix Sarda Y Salvany for all you so called liberal
Catholics.Then when your done follow it up by reading the 13th tribe by Arthur Konstler.Coulters
latest book will put the icing on the cake and if ya
really want to know whats happening in your own
country read The Iron curtain across America.
3:47 am [ Quote ]
Ms.Coulter is right on the money and any
Catholic or related religious person who is shocked by her comments should know that the wool has been over your eyes for too long.You might as well
believe that there is such a thing as Judeo-christian?
The historical fabricators of history even have some people thinking the Jews and christians have some
thing in common.We dont. Jesus was not a jew nor
a rabbi ! iF you really want to know the truth,check out the written story by a Priest in 1886 named Don
Felix Sarda Y Salvany for all you so called liberal
Catholics.Then when your done follow it up by reading the 13th tribe by Arthur Konstler.Coulters
latest book will put the icing on the cake and if ya
really want to know whats happening in your own
country read The Iron curtain across America.
I am not a Liberal but, It is a matter of fact that this country was founded on Judeo-Christian values and
heritage and yes Jesus Christ was a Jew. He was born in Jerusalem.
12:26 pm [ Quote ]
im sure ann was told at one time that when you fight these liberal pigs you get a little muddy, but the pigs like it. do they think kerry would have performed a better job? if yes, how? by hating george w. bush and not having a clue when you ask them what they would do better or different, instead of spewing bile and taking their footballs and going home?
12:40 pm [ Quote ]
Liberal attack style #47. Accuse conservatives of something and then act like it’s true. Lies are as acceptable as fact, since you just need an accusation.
Coulter: The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric project proposed on upper St. John River in Maine, was halted by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant previously believed to be extinct.
Portland Press Herald: The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric project proposed on upper St. John River, is halted by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant believed to be extinct.
Sure looks like plagarism to me. But since conservatives defended Ben Domenech, I’m sure you’ll disagree.
Sure looks like plagarism to me.
Ooh I just plagiarized you! Get a grip dude. Facts are not plagiarizable.
Did she cite it? If not its plagiarism (I know that plagiarism isn’t a “big deal” anymore either though, at least according to the owner of this site). Please retake English and learn how you’re supposed to write, pleasekthx.
6:32 pm [ Quote ]
It’s plagiarism in the sense that saying a sentence that anyone has ever said is plagiarism. If that is plagiarism, then not much can legally be said anymore. We’ve pretty much said most words in most combinations.
I hope this post didn’t express the opinion of anyone who came before me, because I don’t want to have plagiarizee them!
10:32 pm [ Quote ]
Wasn’t the NY Times a newspaper or something?
I heard it was popular many years ago.